EOH - Africa's Largest Technology Service Provider

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the framework concepts and the measurement and recognition requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards ('IFRS') and its interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board ('IASB') and comply with the SAICA Financial Reporting Guides as issued by the Accounting Practices Committee and Financial Pronouncements as issued by the Financial Reporting Standards Council, and contain at a minimum the information required by IAS 34: Interim Financial Reporting, the requirements of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 of South Africa and the JSE Limited Listings Requirements.

The accounting policies and methods of computation applied in the preparation of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements are consistent with those applied in the previous consolidated annual financial statements.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the notes of the type normally included in a set of consolidated annual financial statements. Accordingly, this report is to be read in conjunction with the consolidated annual financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2020.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for certain financial instruments that are measured at fair value through profit or loss at the end of each reporting period.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in South African Rand, which is the Group's presentation currency, rounded to the nearest thousand except for when otherwise indicated. The going concern basis has been used in preparing the interim condensed consolidated financial statements as the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future. Refer to note 4 for further information.

The comparative financial information in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements has been restated based on information available at 31 January 2021. Refer to note 6 for further information.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have not been audited or reviewed by the Group's external auditor.

The IFRS Conceptual Framework states that going concern is an underlying assumption in the preparation of IFRS financial statements. Therefore, the financial statements presume that an entity will continue in operation in the foreseeable future or, if that presumption is not valid, disclosure and a different basis of reporting are required. The board of directors ('Board') believes that, as of the date of this report, the going concern presumption is still appropriate and accordingly the interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Group have been prepared on the going concern basis.

IAS 1 – Preparation of Financial Statements ('IAS 1') requires management to perform an assessment of the Group's ability to continue as a going concern. If management is aware of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the Group's ability to continue as a going concern, IAS 1 requires these uncertainties to be disclosed.

In conducting this assessment, the Board has taken into consideration the following factors:

• The financial performance, condition and cash flows for the Group reflect a loss for the period of R179 million;
• Net asset value attributable to the owners of EOH Holdings Limited at 31 January 2021 of R325 million; and
• Cash outflows from operating activities of R165 million (including continuing and discontinued operations).

Details of the financial performance, condition and cash flows for the Group are explained in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

A detailed action plan for deleveraging the Group to a sustainable level and resolving the 'fit-for-purpose' cost structure was developed by the Group and its lenders and committed to in October 2019, revised in April 2020 and a more sustainable debt structure is in the process of being concluded. Since its announcement in October 2019, the deleveraging plan has been largely executed against and the directors reasonably believe it can continue to be implemented going forward in order to ensure the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.

The key deleveraging requirements of the agreement signed with the Group's lenders in April 2020 required the following milestones to be met:

1. Delever of R500 million by 30 August 2020.
2. Delever of an additional R700 million by 30 November 2020.
3. Delever of an additional R400 million by 28 February 2021.
4. 1 April 2021 full refinancing of the remaining debt.

The key deliverables implemented by the Group in relation to the deleveraging plan include:

1. The Group met the first repayment milestone prior to the end of the 2020 financial year-end. Subsequent to year-end, R450 million of the R700 million 30 November 2020 target was met. As detailed in Note 21, the Group’s disposals process, which is key to the deleveraging plan, has been impacted by COVID-19 in terms of the time to close a deal and investors taking a conservative view on investing capital into new assets. As a result, the remaining R250 million and the additional R400 million deliverable due by 28 February 2021 were not met. The Group has concluded term sheets with lenders which include the refinancing of R650 million that was not settled in terms of the deleveraging agreement. As a result, the Group has received a waiver and extension for repayment of this amount;
2. Liquidation and/or close management of legal entities that are financially distressed;
3. Continued progress on the implementation of a cash pooling policy, allowing cash previously held in individual legal entities to be centrally managed. This allowed the Group’s cash to be in the right place at the right time, without increasing risk to the Group due to improved visibility and cash management systems being implemented; and
4. Management of the Group’s onerous contracts and once-off costs which negatively impacts liquidity.

The Board’s assessment of whether the Group is a going concern was considered and the Board concluded that:

1. The Group is solvent, and is expected to remain solvent after considering the approved budget, updated cash flow forecasts and expected longer-term performance;
2. While the Group’s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by R1.7 billion, the Group has signed term sheets to refinance approximately R2 billion of the Group’s facilities, thus bringing the ratio of current assets to current liabilities to above one times;
3. There is an approved budget for the following 24 months;
4. There are cash flow forecasts for the 12-month period as well as the longer term aligned to the Group’s updated long-term forecasts with adequate consideration being taken into account of cash outflows required for onerous and legacy contracts as well as one-off costs; and
5. The Group has sufficient access to facilities and liquidity events to fund operations for the following 12 months based on the following assumptions:
   • Improved operational performance;
   • The sale of non-core assets, which are at a relatively advanced stage;
   • The refinancing for its term and working capital facilities with its primary lending institutions, the salient commercial terms of which have been agreed by the Group with its lenders;
   • The Group’s assets are appropriately insured; and
   • There is currently no outstanding litigation, that the directors believe has not been adequately provided for, that could pressurise the Group’s ability to meet its obligations.

The Board, after considering the above as well as the risks and mitigating actions, has concluded that the Group should be able to discharge its liabilities as they fall due in the normal course of business and is therefore of the opinion that the going concern assumption is appropriate in the preparation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

No new standards or amendments were applied for the first time to the annual reporting period commencing 1 August 2020.

The previously reported, January 2020 half-year results were prepared prior to the finalisation of restatements, which finalisation only occurred during the year ended 31 July 2020. Consequently, the January 2020 results have now been restated to align with the final conclusions and restatements set out in the 2020 consolidated annual financial statements.

During the year ended 31 July 2020, management identified a number of matters which were incorrectly accounted for or presented in prior periods. Among those matters, the following two matters require restatement to the January 2020 half-year results:

• Revenue-principal versus agent (6.1); and
• Timing of the recognition of provision (6.2).

The 2020 interim condensed consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income has been restated to correct the prior period errors.

The restatements had no impact on any line item in the statement of financial position as at 31 July 2020 and therefore the statement of financial position at 31 July 2020 remains as previously reported. The restatement adjustments are all non-cash adjustments and therefore do not impact cash generated before working capital changes or any other line items on the interim condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

A brief explanation of each category of error is provided below, following which an analysis is included of the financial impact on the affected financial statement line items:

Disaggregated revenue

Impairment losses on financial assets recognised in profit or loss from continuing operations were as follows:

Identification and classification of discontinued operations

There were a number of businesses that were approved for sale at 31 January 2021, and for which the sale is expected to be completed within 12 months from the reporting date, as well as businesses that were already sold during the current and previous reporting periods that have met the requirements to be presented as discontinued operations and have accordingly been presented as such.

Judgement was applied in determining whether a component is a discontinued operation by assessing whether it represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations or is part of a single plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations.

The Group’s intention to dispose of these non-core assets triggered an initial impairment assessment on the underlying assets at 31 January 2021, and the resulting impairment was allocated to the identified disposal groups (refer to note 13 – Assets held for sale).

Loss before taxation before including the loss on disposal and remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell was R49 million (2020: Profit of R96 million).

The Group acquired property, plant and equipment (‘PPE’) at a cost of R30 million (year ended July 2020: R577 million) and intangible assets at a cost of R44 million (year ended July 2020: R187 million). The Group disposed of PPE with a carrying value of R35 million (year ended July 2020: R72 million) and intangible assets with a carrying value of R5 million (year ended July 2020: R19 million). Included in PPE acquired are additions of R3 million (year ended July 2020: R367 million) capitalised as right-of-use assets under IFRS 16 during the period.

An impairment charge of R1 million (year ended July 2020: R2 million) against PPE and Rnil (year ended July 2020: R26 million) against intangible assets has been recognised during the period.

Impairment of goodwill

During the six months ended 31 January 2021, the depressed economic environment as a result of COVID-19 impacted a number of the Group’s operations, giving rise to impairments of goodwill in certain cash-generating units (‘CGUs’). Where impairment indicators were identified, the carrying amounts of the CGUs were compared to their respective recoverable amounts. These recoverable amounts were determined through value-in-use calculations discounting future cash flows.

iOCO

An impairment charge amounting to R61 million was recognised for the Compute CGU, driven mainly by delayed IT infrastructure projects and unanticipated margin pressure, both driven by the negative economic impacts of COVID-19. The goodwill balance for Compute at 31 January 2021 amounts to R151 million, after recognising the impairment charge.

NEXTEC

The Enerweb CGU has been classified as held for sale and an impairment charge amounting to R9 million was recognised on the write-down of the CGU’s carrying amount to its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount was calculated as the fair value (selling price) less cost to sell. Within the Enerweb CGU, R24.5 million of goodwill remains.

The Group has refined its operational structure into three distinct operating units to allow for leaner and more agile core businesses with separate capital and governance structures. On 11 December 2018, the Group announced that opportunities would be explored for the sale of certain non-core assets, of which many have been sold during the year. There continues to be a number of businesses approved for sale and for which the sale is expected to be completed within 12 months from the reporting date. These businesses are classified as disposal groups held for sale and the assets and liabilities of these disposal groups have been presented as held for sale.

The major classes of assets and liabilities of the disposal groups, per reportable segment, classified as held for sale are as follows:

The Group has continued its strategy of disposing of non-core assets to assist with its deleveraging plans and remove unnecessary complexity within the Group structure. In line with this strategy the Group has disposed of its investments in a number of subsidiaries and joint ventures during the period.

The carrying amount of major classes of assets and liabilities, associated with subsidiaries and equity-accounted investments disposed of during the current period, are as follows:

Authorised

500 000 000 ordinary shares of no par value
40 000 000 EOH A shares of no par value

Unissued

323 455 039 (2020: 323 455 039) unissued ordinary shares are under the control of the directors in terms of the provisions of the Company's memorandum of incorporation (MoI).

* Ring-fenced debt. 

Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss, in terms of the hierarchy, are classified as level 3 as the valuation techniques used are based on unobservable inputs for the liability.

Vendors for acquisition

The balance in respect of vendors for acquisition relates to the contingent consideration where business combinations are subject to profit warranties. The profit warranties allow for a defined adjusted value to the consideration payable in the event that the warranted profit after tax is not achieved, or in the event that it is exceeded, an agreed sharing in the surplus. The fair value of the contingent arrangement is initially estimated by applying the income approach assuming that the relevant profit warrant will be achieved. Subsequent measurement uses the income approach to calculate the present value of the expected settlement payment using the latest approved budgeted results and reasonable growth rates for the remainder of the relevant warranty periods, taking into account any specific circumstances.

Profit warrant periods normally extend over a 24-month period.

Upwardly revised performance expectations would result in an increase in the related liability, limited to the terms of the applicable purchase agreement.

Fair values have been determined using discounted cash flows. Unobservable inputs include budgeted results based on margins and revenue growth rates historically achieved by the various segments. The applicable discount rate is 7%, discounting cash flows over a two-year period. Changing such inputs to reflect reasonably possible alternative assumptions does not significantly change the fair value of the vendors for acquisition liability. The EOH Group has an established control framework with respect to the measurement of fair values. This includes a valuation team that reports directly to the Group Chief Financial Officer, who oversees all significant fair value measurements.

Vendors for acquisition reconciliation of movement

The Group does not have any financial instruments that are subject to offsetting.

All short-term receivables and payables carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.

There have been no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy.

Non-recurring fair value measurements

Disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. The fair values were determined based on sales agreements that are in place for each of the disposal groups that are held for sale. The total of such fair values is R923 million (July 2020: R1 033 million). These fair values are categorised as level 3, based on inputs used.

EOH issued parent company guarantees ('PCGs') during May 2019, as required by a client for a wholly owned subsidiary, PiA Solar SA Proprietary Limited ('PiA').The guarantees provided are for a period of years during both construction and after handover, including an operation warranty guarantee, which by the nature could (in the event of underperformance by PiA) compel EOH to either ensure physical performance or settle such underperformance in cash terms. While PiA had undergone some operational challenges as a result of several factors, including COVID-19, EOH has intervened in order to minimise the potential impact of these PCGs. The projects subject to these PCGs are now substantially complete, with the last project to achieve handover to the end client completed by end-March 2021. EOH thus believes that the risk presented by the PCGs, albeit still in existence, is now sufficiently mitigated such that no cash flow impact is expected in the future.

During the prior financial year, EOH also issued a PCG for another subsidiary, EOH Mthombo Proprietary Limited ('EOH Mthombo'), relating to the implementation of an ERP solution at the City of Johannesburg ('COJ') for a project which was signed during the 2017 financial year. The COJ guarantee compels EOH to ensure physical performance. EOH Mthombo has since terminated its agreement with COJ and is currently negotiating its exit from the project.

EOH became aware of certain fraudulent conduct that was perpetrated between executives of another subsidiary, Cornastone Enterprise Solutions Proprietary Limited ('Cornastone'), as well as senior employees of Cell C Limited ('Cell C'), as it related to the supply of certain equipment and software licences. EOH commissioned an investigation in collaboration with Cell C, which has culminated in criminal charges being levelled against the former executives of Cornastone and certain employees of Cell C.

Fine imposed by the JSE Limited

The JSE Limited imposed a fine on EOH on 29 July 2020 for prior period errors contained in EOH's previously published financial statements for the financial years ended 31 July 2017 and 31 July 2018. The fine was for R7.5 million of which R2.5 million is suspended for a period of five years on condition that EOH is not found to be in breach of material and important provisions of the JSE Listings Requirements. The R5 million was raised as liability at 31 July 2020, against which payments have been made, with the suspended amount being a contingent liability.

Litigation

EOH and its subsidiaries are involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which are considered material on an individual basis or in aggregate. Management has no reason to believe that the disposition of these matters will have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, financial results or cash flows of EOH.

Uncertain tax exposure

The Group has an ongoing tax dispute dating back to 2012 related to a PAYE dispute in one of its staff outsourcing businesses. At 31 January 2021, the Group had provided for R257 million on the PAYE liability assessed and potential future assessments, and has submitted a notice of objection to the South African Revenue Service ('SARS'). Based on internal and external legal and technical advice obtained, the Group remains confident that it has a strong legal case to contest the remaining exposure. R28 million of the R257 million provision was repaid as at 31 January 2021.

There is further uncertainty regarding historical taxes that may be due as a result of the impact of the fraudulent transactions identified in the forensic investigation performed by ENSafrica during the 2019 financial year. Provisions based on best estimates were recognised at 31 July 2019. The Group has obtained further external legal guidance on the matter in the current year of assessment and has reversed a portion of the initial provision raised based on guidance, during the period ended 31 January 2021.

There is a further exposure and provision raised within the Group relating to incorrect VAT zero rating of intragroup invoicing. The Group is in the process of preparing a submission in terms of the SARS Voluntary Disclosure Programme to rectify this position taken. A provision of R44 million has been raised at 31 January 2021.

Uncertain exposure due to suspect transactions

An assessment was undertaken in relation to contracts flagged by ENSafrica as being associated with suspicious activities, for purposes of determining the likelihood of a claim/s being raised against EOH Mthombo in relation to the contracts in question. The total contingent exposure identified in consequence of the results of that assessment is R84.2 million.

The assessments which resulted in claims being regarded as possible and where a contingent liability was identified were in relation to the following contracts:

• Department of Water and Sanitation – The contract is currently under negotiation with the SIU to finalise settlement of the fine.
• Department of Home Affairs – ABIS (Biometric): At 31 March 2021 this contract has been ceded. An arbitration process is underway to finalise claims from both parties' sides and is expected to be concluded by 30 June 2021.

COVID-19

The Group considers information obtained subsequent to the reporting date, in relation to events it knows or should have known and expected eventualities identified as at 31 January 2021, as adjusting subsequent events. With regards to financial reporting impacts associated with COVID-19, the key principle is that COVID-19 is considered to be sufficiently prevalent in the Group's major markets at 31 January 2021. Therefore, COVID-19-related events that arise in the post-balance sheet period, that provide additional information in relation to assets and liabilities in existence at 31 January 2021, have been considered adjusting subsequent events. New events which occur after 31 January 2021, which do not relate to existing assets and liabilities related to COVID-19 at the reporting date (such as donations to relief initiatives), are considered to be non-adjusting subsequent events, and these, together with their relating financial effects, have been disclosed to the extent that they are considered to be material.

Deleveraging

The Group entered into an agreement with its lenders to deleverage R1 600 million by 28 February 2021. As at 31 January 2021, a total of R950 million had been repaid. The Group's disposal process, which is key to the deleveraging plan, has been impacted by COVID-19 in terms of the time to close a deal and investors taking a conservative view on investing capital into new assets. Lockdown level 5 and level 4 had a significant impact on delaying the process as well as an impact on operating performance of the IP B2B2C assets. As a result of these delays, the Group did not meet the full deleverage requirement of R1 600 million.

The Group has been engaging with lenders to create a more efficient debt structure for the longer term and has concluded long-form term sheets with its lenders to refinance the remaining debt due to lenders. This includes the refinancing of R650 million that was not settled in terms of the deleveraging agreement. As a result, the Group has received a waiver and extension for repayment of these amounts.